Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1Lgg_FWak_9yyeF0Ovn28pA4x0QyoDHWWga9p2e7udSCw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions  (Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 3:49 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:11 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 3.
> There is inconsistent wording for what seems to be the same condition.
> e.g.1 The existing documentation [2] says "Xid of the transaction. The
> XID is sent only when user has requested streaming of in-progress
> transactions."
> e.g.2 For a similar case the patch says "Xid of the transaction (only
> present for streamed transactions)."
> I think there should be consistent wording used on this page where possible.
>

I think this is already modified as below in the patch. Is there any
other place you are referring to?

@@ -6457,8 +6462,7 @@ Message
 </term>
 <listitem>
 <para>
-                Xid of the transaction. The XID is sent only when user has
-                requested streaming of in-progress transactions.
+                Xid of the transaction (only present for streamed
transactions).

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: TRUNCATE on foreign table
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions