On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 7:36 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2022-Jul-29, Peter Smith wrote:
>
> > PSA v2 of this patch, modified as suggested.
>
> I don't object to doing this, but I think these two functions should
> stay together nonetheless.
Hmm, I think there is some confusion because different people have
mentioned multiple functions.
AFAIK, the patch *does* ensure the 2 functions (is_publishable_class
and is_publishable_relation) stay together.
If you believe there is still a problem after applying the patch
please explicitly name what function(s) you think should be moved.
------
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
