I think its a big improvement, but is still a little green. In a couple more versions were all gonna love it.
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Day, David <dday@redcom.com> wrote:
Ditto to MK's comment.
Developers can somewhat tolerate this "alpha" state in pgadmin4. I would never push/recommend pgadmin4 to our customers. Someone indicated pg4 get 20 compliments for every negative, I would offer there's 19 that simply decided it was not ready, and did not give your any feedback. They just hope it continues to evolve, and pgadminIII continues to be available.
On 19.5.2017 14:38, Tomek wrote: > You must understand one thing - first You stop developing v3, than release feature stripped v4, than demand to report issue/feature request You already know it is missing... > Maybe this news for You but people used this software for more than 10 years - they got used to functionality - what we've expected was improvement (new features) not regress...
Cannot agree more. Apart from discussion about chosen technology and related impacts (especially on user experience of desktop users), pgAdmin4 shouldn't be yet published as stable release. Since pgA4 remains feature-wise-incomplete comparing to pgA3, it should be called 'alpha' and therefore it shouldn't be offered as replacement of pgA3. In case it is intended to be something else than pgA3's successor, then shouldn't be called pgAdmin (to avoid confusion while comparing features).
