Re: [PATCH] Fix disabled_nodes propagation for single-child Append paths - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tender Wang
Subject Re: [PATCH] Fix disabled_nodes propagation for single-child Append paths
Date
Msg-id CAHewXN=WhqCuE0Y=eFKrKiwtrnn93cX7ON1vFFv_6YVfQ-W0nA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread
In response to Re: [PATCH] Fix disabled_nodes propagation for single-child Append paths  (Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_restore_attribute_stats() accepts non-finite values
List pgsql-hackers
Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> 于2026年8月28日周五 14:30写道:
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2026 at 2:02 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I also think the one reported here is slightly worse due to the
> > behaviour depending on the number of pruned partitions.
>
> Agreed, and I think you are right about the other two being consistent
> in a way this one is not.  This one only misbehaviors when a single
> child survives, so the same query can honour enable_indexscan=off or
> not depending on how many partitions are pruned.
>
> I've pushed this patch and back-patched it to v18.  (I have a typo in
> my previous email saying this is a v17 regression, but it should be
> v18).

Thanks for pushing.



--
Thanks,
Tender Wang



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Chao Li
Date:
Subject: Re: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) fails when replica identity index is dropped
Next
From: "cca5507"
Date:
Subject: Re: timeout value overflow in wait for lsn