Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Christensen
Subject Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Date
Msg-id CAHM0NXgPhe_OF81MyA9ocWZ=b+oEAHtQHoDXw4DverPdbkXzpg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 11:05 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> David Christensen <david@pgguru.net> writes:
> > Here is a rebased version with a few more tests.  I also changed the
> > main check here to using `!contain_agg_clause` instead of
> > `!IsA(Aggref))` directly.  (This was defined in `optimizer/clauses.h`,
> > but we already are pulling in `optimizer.h`, so it felt valid to me.)
>
> contain_agg_clause will blow up on a SubLink, so I doubt this is
> gonna be robust.

Fair enough, see that Assert now; easy enough to make a new
expression_tree_walker that only looks for Aggref and short-circuits
SubLink (which I assume is the right behavior here, but might have to
add some more tests/play around with subqueries in the GROUP BY ALL
part).

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL
Next
From: David Christensen
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL