Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwHNXbYBFW+Lfjq_mBkVS182xFt=evM-jO4vrbib+ZNrGA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:58 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While working on
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CABUevEzwMa9y+Bp4Fi4fE4hmPfZMjOZOmuLVtbHhPWtcujrmLg@mail.gmail.com
> I once more taken aback by the total lack of consistency between the
> three files in $subject. Some of the inconsistency of guc.c vs. the rest
> comes from having separate lists for different datatypes - hard to avoid
> - but even disregarding that, there seems to be little to no
> consistency.
>
> How about we try to order them the same?

+1, especially for the ordering in config.sgml vs. postgresql.conf.sample
because that consistency makes it easy for users to use them.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency
Next
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw : Not able to update foreign table referring to a local table's view when use_remote_estimate = true