Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwHCUBNj09Mv1VpQgG-4NZon8eWZCgctba4sbb5_07QTdA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: checkpoint_flush_after documentation inconsistency  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2016-04-21 11:20:38 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On 2016-04-18 14:33:28 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> > > The documentation says that the default value is 128Kb on Linux, but the
>> > > code says it's 256Kb.
>> > >
>> > > Not sure which one is correct, but the other one should be updated :) I'm
>> > > guessing it's a copy/paste mistake in the docs, but since I'm not sure I'm
>> > > not just pushing a fix.
>> >
>> > I think you're right.
>> >
>> > I also found another several small problems regarding XXX_flush_after
>> > parameters.
>>
>> Thanks for finding these, once I'm back home/office from pgconf.nyc
>> (tonight / tomorrow) I'll push a fix.
>
> Pushed a fix, could you check that you're ok with the result?

The fix looks good to me. Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dump dump catalog ACLs
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Ordering in guc.c vs. config.sgml vs. postgresql.sample.conf