On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
>> ISTM that writing an invalid-page table to the disk for every restartpoints is
>> better approach.
>
> I still say that's uncalled-for overkill. The invalid-page table is not
> necessary for recovery, it's only a debugging cross-check.
If so, there is no risk even if the invalid-page table is lost and the check
is skipped unexpectedly?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
