Re: bug of recovery? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: bug of recovery?
Date
Msg-id 13861.1317096344@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: bug of recovery?  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: bug of recovery?
List pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes:
> ISTM that writing an invalid-page table to the disk for every restartpoints is
> better approach.

I still say that's uncalled-for overkill.  The invalid-page table is not
necessary for recovery, it's only a debugging cross-check.  You're more
likely to introduce bugs than fix any by adding a mechanism like that.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: random isolation test failures
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: random isolation test failures