Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | Fujii Masao |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | CAHGQGwGbYi5H74TFA78rQnTRmeeMdFshknGtZHTPJ7hzRwUw0Q@mail.gmail.com Whole thread |
| In response to | Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby (Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka.jun@po.ntts.co.jp>) |
| Responses |
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby
Re: Online base backup from the hot-standby |
| List | pgsql-hackers |
2011/10/12 Jun Ishiduka <ishizuka.jun@po.ntts.co.jp>:
> > ERROR: full_page_writes on master is set invalid at least once since
> > latest checkpoint
> >
> > I think this error should be rewritten as
> > ERROR: full_page_writes on master has been off at some point since
> > latest checkpoint
> >
> > We should be using 'off' instead of 'invalid' since that is what is what
> > the user sets it to.
>
> Sure.
What about the following message? It sounds more precise to me.
ERROR: WAL generated with full_page_writes=off was replayed since last
restartpoint
> I updated to patch corresponded above-comments.
Thanks for updating the patch! Here are the comments:
* don't yet have the insert lock, forcePageWrites could change under us, * but we'll recheck it once we have
thelock. */
- doPageWrites = fullPageWrites || Insert->forcePageWrites;
+ doPageWrites = Insert->fullPageWrites || Insert->forcePageWrites;
The source comment needs to be modified.
* just turned off, we could recompute the record without full pages, but * we choose not to bother.) */
- if (Insert->forcePageWrites && !doPageWrites)
+ if ((Insert->fullPageWrites || Insert->forcePageWrites) && !doPageWrites)
Same as above.
+ LWLockAcquire(WALInsertLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+ XLogCtl->Insert.fullPageWrites = fullPageWrites;
+ LWLockRelease(WALInsertLock);
I don't think WALInsertLock needs to be hold here because there is no
concurrently running process which can access Insert.fullPageWrites.
For example, Insert->currpos and Insert->LogwrtResult are also changed
without the lock there.
The source comment of XLogReportParameters() needs to be modified.
XLogReportParameters() should skip writing WAL if full_page_writes has not been
changed by SIGHUP.
XLogReportParameters() should skip updating pg_control if any parameter related
to hot standby has not been changed.
+ if (!fpw_manager)
+ {
+ LWLockAcquire(WALInsertLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
+ fpw = XLogCtl->Insert.fullPageWrites;
+ LWLockRelease(WALInsertLock);
It's safe to take WALInsertLock with shared mode here.
In checkpoint, XLogReportParameters() is called only when wal_level is
hot_standby.
OTOH, in walwriter, it's always called even when wal_level is not hot_standby.
Can't we skip calling XLogReportParameters() whenever wal_level is not
hot_standby?
In do_pg_start_backup() and do_pg_stop_backup(), the spinlock must be held to
see XLogCtl->lastFpwDisabledLSN.
+ /* check whether the master's FPW is 'off' since pg_start_backup. */
+ if (recovery_in_progress && XLByteLE(startpoint, XLogCtl->lastFpwDisabledLSN))
+ ereport(ERROR,
+ (errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
+ errmsg("full_page_writes on master has been off at some point
during online backup")));
What about changing the error message to:
ERROR: WAL generated with full_page_writes=off was replayed during online backup
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
pgsql-hackers by date: