Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwFXha3RwsnALVcCD8_7VTh1tQwMsuR0vdXFgn2iawrCmg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Not necessarily, because it's harmless.  It's there for purely
>> aesthetical reasons, so it's your choice whether to add it or not.
>> Having it there is slightly easier on somebody reading the code,
>> perhaps.

Agreed.

> On my side, that's up to you Fujii-san. The patch does what it states, I
> only think that this extra 0 should be added either everywhere or nowhere.

Yep. I added extra 0 everywhere.

Ok, I just applied the patch. Thanks for the review!

> Not mandatory either: drop test_param_unit in the regression tests after
> running the test queries.

I don't have strong opinion about this. There are many tables which
regression test creates but doesn't drop. But if you strongly think that
the table must be dropped, I'm OK with that.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter