On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:52 PM Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com> wrote:
> The patch LGTM.
Thanks for the review!
I've pushed the patch and backpatched it to all supported versions.
> I am wondering whether it is helpful to add some
> comments for this overflowed array
Yes, do you have any specific suggestions?
> and replacing literal zeros with the constant InvalidXLogRecPtr for
> better readability.
>
> /* InvalidXLogRecPtr means no overflow yet */
> if (lag_tracker->overflowed[i].lsn == InvalidXLogRecPtr)
I couldn't find any code like "lag_tracker->overflowed[i].lsn == 0",
so I'm not sure which part should be replaced with InvalidXLogRecPtr.
Could you point me to the exact location?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao