Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date
Msg-id CAHGQGwEBpmD7M4e_-LiP8F47EwLrgat3naNqVuAErn=B3tSDNQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2016-04-04 10:35:34 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 4 April 2016 at 09:28, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Barring any objections, I'll commit this patch.
>
> No objection here either, just one question: Has anybody thought about
> the ability to extend this to do per-database syncrep?

Nope at least for me... You'd like to extend synchronous_standby_names
so that users can specify that per-database?

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Yet another small patch - reorderbuffer.c:1099