Re: vacuum -vs reltuples on insert only index - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: vacuum -vs reltuples on insert only index
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzne_gedbmECvjYjyrfWeFOBVxFGfLOTE8Y0VHw0KOzFFA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: vacuum -vs reltuples on insert only index  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: vacuum -vs reltuples on insert only index  (Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 10:03 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Actually, it seems better to always count num_index_tuples the old way
> during cleanup-only index VACUUMs, despite the inaccuracy that that
> creates with posting list tuples.

Pushed a fix for this just now.

Thanks for the report!
-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: Log message for GSS connection is missing once connection authorization is successful.
Next
From: "k.jamison@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: [Patch] Optimize dropping of relation buffers using dlist