Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WznJVh46LPDmkOo95zyanBdMteX5gDQpo6roZeYP4kq+bQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree  (Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, May 11, 2025 at 11:09 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me> wrote:
> I where "revert" is master with the removal patch. Sorry about the
> confusion, I guess I was distracted and did some mistake.
>
> So, this seems to be in line with the hypothesis ...

That makes way more sense.

I wonder if we can fix this problem by getting rid of the old support
routine #5, "options". It currently doesn't do anything, and I always
thought it was strange that it was added "for uniformity" with other
index AMs.

OTOH, one could argue that it's only a matter of time until somebody
needs to add another support routine to nbtree; why delay dealing with
the problem that you've highlighted? Right now I don't really have an
opinion on how best to address the problem.

--
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum statistics
Next
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Why our Valgrind reports suck