Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WznAbZfNm+G3A7VzOnbQMMRU0Rxs-Y-S4uEH9ntyo5akAA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:29 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Um.  That would not be just an add-on script but something that
> genbki.pl would have to accept.  I'm not excited about that; it would
> complicate what's already complex, and if it works enough for test
> purposes then it wouldn't really stop a committer who wasn't paying
> attention from committing the patch un-revised.
>
> To the extent that this works at all, OIDs in the 9000 range ought
> to be enough of a flag already, I think.

I tend to agree that this isn't enough of a problem to justify making
genbki.pl significantly more complicated.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?
Next
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: ON SELECT rule on a table without columns