Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzn6pGXE-0vwwVbGZ--+qACd8D0ArqfZx7k05XaibAaFrQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 6:37 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> It would be awkward if we just used nBlocksWritten within
> LogicalTapeSetBlocks() in the case where we didn't preallocate (or in
> all cases). Not entirely sure what to do about that just yet.

I guess that that's the logical thing to do, as in the attached patch.

What do you think, Jeff?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow ERROR from heap_prepare_freeze_tuple to be downgraded to WARNING
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: Division in dynahash.c due to HASH_FFACTOR