Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzn0uQGMPd5u9pMZkvFbXS9V0knvLYqVq0Jnge-d_QEOiQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 8:48 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Okay, let's go with snapshotConflictHorizon. I'll use that name in the
> next revision, which I should be able to post tomorrow.

Attached is a somewhat cleaned up version that uses that symbol name
for everything.

--
Peter Geoghegan

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block