Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block
Date
Msg-id 1690542.1668637563@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block  (Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes:
> I think this requesting autovacuum worker should be a distinct
> command. Or at least an explicit option to vacuum.

+1.  That'd reduce confusion, and perhaps we could remove some
of the restrictions.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs
Next
From: Matheus Alcantara
Date:
Subject: Re: Index not getting cleaned even though vacuum is running