Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzmyPS3BcvZnDWDD3LwKxb0M76icOn5LmoB=Nr7eOSHZyA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 02:28:50PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I pushed some fixes produced here.  Attached is the remainder of the
>> patch you submitted.  I notice now that we haven't actually fixed
>> Peter's source of complaint, though.  AFAICS your patch just adds test
>> cases, and upthread discussion apparently converges on not doing
>> anything about the code.  I'm not yet sure what to think of that ...
>
> Thanks Álvaro.  I tend to think that there is little point in changing
> the error handling, still it would be good to get test coverage.  That's
> not really a bug though as in all those cases we don't get errors like
> "could not open file" or such.  So we could also let things as they are
> now.

Now that the relkind issue is documented, I wouldn't mind just leaving it as-is.

--
Peter Geoghegan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Local partitioned indexes and pageinspect
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning