Re: Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzkzTo=kJ9krKyVTopnNC96eLmYH1cCGZcXhRk5SZEu_9Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Enhanced rmgr desc routines test !has_image, not has_data  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 11:10 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> Yeah, I agree that your suggestion is more useful for debugging when a
> record includes both a block image and some data associated to it.
> So, +1.

Okay, pushed that fix just now.

--
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: pg_stat_io not tracking smgrwriteback() is confusing
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Direct I/O