Re: [HACKERS] Polyphase merge is obsolete - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Polyphase merge is obsolete
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzkcF+ociRhEzUc0=Go2ZLKDe9co-Y0kSghPaht7H30JQQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Polyphase merge is obsolete  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Polyphase merge is obsolete  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
>> The number of *input* tapes we can use in each merge pass is still limited,
>> by the memory needed for the tape buffers and the merge heap, but only one
>> output tape is active at any time. The inactive output tapes consume very
>> few resources. So the whole idea of trying to efficiently reuse input tapes
>> as output tapes is pointless
>
> I picked this up again. The patch won't apply cleanly. Can you rebase?

Since we have an awful lot of stuff in the last CF, and this patch
doesn't seem particularly strategic, I've marked it "Returned with
Feedback".

Thanks
-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017
Next
From: Thomas Munro
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017