On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I took a quick look at these. The v11 patch seems OK as far as it goes,
> but I wonder if you shouldn't also include the RelationMapUpdateMap
> hunk from the master patch, ie adding rejection of map changes in parallel
> mode.
Good idea. I'll do that.
> I don't have any objection to the master patch, but it'd be good to get
> a +1 from someone who's spent more time with the parallelism
> infrastructure than I have.
That would be my preference too, but commit 29d58fd3 is very analogous
to the proposed master branch fix, so I feel that it's reasonable to
proceed without final approval from someone like Robert or Amit. I'll
leave pushing until late in the day tomorrow, pacific time.
--
Peter Geoghegan
