Re: Rethinking MemoryContext creation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: Rethinking MemoryContext creation
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wzk4FQq4SpzNp0ppJ78NVMtBSznG=WtU=pxqq=iMQfY1QQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Rethinking MemoryContext creation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Rethinking MemoryContext creation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Overall I'm seeing about a 5% improvement in a "pgbench -S" scenario,
> although that number is a bit shaky since the run-to-run variation
> is a few percent anyway.

Is that with "-M prepared", too?

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Typo in recent commit
Next
From: Christian Ullrich
Date:
Subject: RE: pl/perl extension fails on Windows