Re: Rethinking MemoryContext creation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Rethinking MemoryContext creation
Date
Msg-id 13309.1512920544@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Rethinking MemoryContext creation  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: Rethinking MemoryContext creation  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Overall I'm seeing about a 5% improvement in a "pgbench -S" scenario,
>> although that number is a bit shaky since the run-to-run variation
>> is a few percent anyway.

> Is that with "-M prepared", too?

No, I didn't use that.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Emre Hasegeli
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uninterruptible slow geo_ops.c
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Inconsistency in plpgsql's error context reports