Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=xYGcOOXYr8fhbJE_FtP48DZ7o-mV_0jrdFtGJ+2rZGg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:52 PM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan.deolasee@gmail.com> wrote:
> A quick gdb tracing shows that the CTE itself is assigned plan_id 1 and the
> SubPlan then gets plan_id 2. I can investigate further, but given that we
> see a similar behaviour with regular UPDATE, I don't think it's worth.

Clearly I jumped the gun on this one. I agree that this is fine.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Backend memory dump analysis
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Undesirable entries in typedefs list