Snapshot scalability patch issue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Snapshot scalability patch issue
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=L=nBoepQdH9b5Qd0nMvepFT2CnT6sjWvvpOXa=K8HVQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Snapshot scalability patch issue
List pgsql-hackers
The call to heap_page_prune() within lazy_scan_heap() passes a bool
literal ('false') as its fourth argument. But the fourth argument is
of type TransactionId, not bool. This has been the case since the
snapshot scalability work performed by commit dc7420c2c92. Surely
something is amiss here.

I also notice some inconsistencies in the heap_page_prune() prototype
names vs the corresponding definition names. Might be worth doing
something about in passing.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiro Ikeda
Date:
Subject: Re: About to add WAL write/fsync statistics to pg_stat_wal view
Next
From: Masahiro Ikeda
Date:
Subject: Re: About to add WAL write/fsync statistics to pg_stat_wal view