Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date
Msg-id CAH2-Wz=6k-5TbHn70BLv5bB24=-HhgV2u-yW34GqLXBjvHHoOg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11  (Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 03:25:48PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
>> >A MERGE mapped to a DML like this:
>
> I needed to spend more time reading MERGE docs from other RDBMSes.

Please don't hijack this thread. It's about the basic question of
semantics, and is already hard enough for others to follow as-is.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nico Williams
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Add ALWAYS DEFERRED option for constraints
Next
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Refactor handling of database attributes betweenpg_dump and pg_dumpall