On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 9:44 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> Since this ignore_killed_tuples change is also very simple, and also
> seems like an easy win, I think that it can be committed as part of
> the second patch. Without it needing to wait for too much more
> performance validation.
My plan is to commit the entire patch series (with a modified second
patch that includes the ignore_killed_tuples change) in the next
couple of days.
As far as I can determine through performance validation that tested a
variety of different scan types (simple point lookups, range scans,
and a variety of different SAOP scan patterns), the patch series is an
unambiguous win. It appears to be slightly faster even in
unsympathetic cases, such as standard pgbench SELECT.
--
Peter Geoghegan
