пн, 8 дек. 2025 г. в 01:31, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2025 at 9:44 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > Since this ignore_killed_tuples change is also very simple, and also > seems like an easy win, I think that it can be committed as part of > the second patch. Without it needing to wait for too much more > performance validation.
My plan is to commit the entire patch series (with a modified second patch that includes the ignore_killed_tuples change) in the next couple of days.
As far as I can determine through performance validation that tested a variety of different scan types (simple point lookups, range scans, and a variety of different SAOP scan patterns), the patch series is an unambiguous win. It appears to be slightly faster even in unsympathetic cases, such as standard pgbench SELECT.
Even without the performance increase, I think this a valuable code reorganization, worth committing.
I've compiled and run test (check and installcheck) with all 3 patches, did a small standard pgbench run:
