> The proposed patch places some repetitive code in a helper function. > The value of this change is arguably not that high but it makes the > code a bit neater IMO.
I agree with your suggestion to refactor the duplicated code into a function.
On 10/8/25 10:02 PM, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > Hi, > > The proposed patch places some repetitive code in a helper function. > The value of this change is arguably not that high but it makes the > code a bit neater IMO. >
It also reduces the ease of reading the code. Just add a function for a single if statement. I don't think it's necessary.