Re: TOAST versus toast - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From wenhui qiu
Subject Re: TOAST versus toast
Date
Msg-id CAGjGUA+aPxvyW1a7bzpqTD0EUaLRfTYNqR+wWNt5DjvpUcZ1hg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TOAST versus toast  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,
I think this point is of no significance at all. Besides, this is a document that has been around for over ten years. Everyone has become accustomed to this kind of expression. This is just a case of being full but having nothing to do with anything.


On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 at 10:31, David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 8:33 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks for your suggestions. At this point option (1) is looking most
attractive. Probably, I will just withdraw the CF entry soon unless
there is some new interest. Just chipping away fixing a few places
isn't going to achieve the consistency this thread was aiming for.


I've moved this back to waiting on author pending a final decision.  Interested parties might still chime in but it doesn't seem like it is actively looking for reviewers at this point.

David J.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Call for Posters: PGConf.dev 2025
Next
From: Álvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: remove unnecessary explicit type conversion (to char) for appendStringInfoChar function calls