Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Claudio Freire
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Date
Msg-id CAGTBQpZMzhZTONdhot2E5VJiOCzm94H=Dqhjk+JxsLuTpS4O0A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Rebased version of the patches attached
>
> The status of the patch is misleading:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/15/844/. This was marked as waiting
> on author but a new version has been published. Let's be careful.
>
> The last patches I am aware of, aka those from
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAGTBQpZHTf2JtShC=ijc9wzEipo3XOKWQhx+8WiP7ZjPC3FBEg@mail.gmail.com,
> do not apply. I am moving the patch to the next commit fest with a
> waiting on author status, as this should be reviewed, but those need a
> rebase.

They did apply at the time, but I think major work on vacuum was
pushed since then, and also I was traveling so out of reach.

It may take some time to rebase them again. Should I move to needs
review myself after that?


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Partition pruning for Star Schema
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem