Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Date
Msg-id CAB7nPqQ2o4ZSy13Hb9GAYj3_50r+hxfNjqc48vcKjaH7n59bBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem  (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
> They did apply at the time, but I think major work on vacuum was
> pushed since then, and also I was traveling so out of reach.
>
> It may take some time to rebase them again. Should I move to needs
> review myself after that?

Sure, if you can get into this state, please feel free to update the
status of the patch yourself.
-- 
Michael


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum: allow usage of more than 1GB of work mem
Next
From: Andrey Borodin
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we actually need an ItemId array on nbtree pages containingfixed-width tuples?