Steve Chavez <steve@supabase.io> writes: > I found "..." confusing in some comments, so this patch changes it to > "cstring". Which seems to be the intention after all.
Those comments are Berkeley-era, making them probably a decade older than the "cstring" pseudotype (invented in b663f3443). Perhaps what you suggest is an improvement, but I'm not sure that appealing to original intent can make the case.