Re: Make copyObject work in C++ - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Make copyObject work in C++
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQTiQBs7SchE2um1VKbEzP7QCmaHKezj0mofqhPC60w7qQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Make copyObject work in C++  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 25 Jan 2026 at 21:06, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Named args make that easier in two ways: First, only extensions using the
> to-be-removed option will fail. Second, removal of options reliably generates
> errors, rather than bogusly use one field for another, just because the types
> are compatible.

Fair enough, for removals it has some benefits. Still seems like a
relatively small win for something I don't expect us to be doing
anytime soon (name and version I expect to stay around forever).



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jelte Fennema-Nio
Date:
Subject: Re: Make copyObject work in C++
Next
From: David Rowley
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix a reference error for window functions: In the function 'find_window_functions', the deduplication logic should be removed