Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQQirExbHe6uLa4C-sP=wTR1jazR_wgCWd4177QE-=VFDw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 03:39, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> We follow the common en-US usage: "canceled", "canceling" but
> "cancellation".  Blame Webstah et al.

I changed all the places that were not adhering to those spellings.
There were also a few of such places in parts of the codebase that
these changes didn't touch. I included a new 0001 patch to fix those.

I do feel like this patchset is pretty much in a committable state. So
it would be very much appreciated if any comitter could help push it
over the finish line.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Julien Rouhaud
Date:
Subject: Re: btree_gist into core?
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Relation bulk write facility