Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel
Date
Msg-id CA+hUKG+Lrq+ty6yWXF5572qNQ8KwxGwG5n4fsEcCUap685nWvQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel  (Jelte Fennema <postgres@jeltef.nl>)
Responses Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel
List pgsql-hackers
Trivial observation: these patches obviously introduce many instances
of words derived from "cancel", but they don't all conform to
established project decisions (cf 21f1e15a) about how to spell them.
We follow the common en-US usage: "canceled", "canceling" but
"cancellation".  Blame Webstah et al.

https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/176957/cancellation-canceled-canceling-us-usage



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: yuansong
Date:
Subject: How to solve the problem of one backend process crashing and causing other processes to restart?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: How to solve the problem of one backend process crashing and causing other processes to restart?