Re: Detailed release notes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jelte Fennema-Nio
Subject Re: Detailed release notes
Date
Msg-id CAGECzQQBEvSX8Ek027NWstf1iKrWyTfjm2TO8rOzX5xpa-6swg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Detailed release notes  (Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 18 Sept 2024 at 13:38, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos@f10.com.br> wrote:
>> Maybe this shouldn't be done between RC1 and GA.  This is clearly a more
>> complex topic that should go through a proper review and testing cycle.
>
> I think this is just a question of decision, not reviewing or testing.
> And I'm sure there will be more people reading Release Notes now, in September and October, than in January or April.

+1. Also, IMHO the links even in their current simple form of "§ § §
§" are a huge net-positive on the release notes. So yes, I'm sure we
can format them more clearly with some bikeshedding, but removing them
completely seems like an overreaction to me.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Marcos Pegoraro
Date:
Subject: Re: Detailed release notes
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation