On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Robert Eckhardt <reckhardt@pivotal.io> wrote:On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 12:27 AM Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi Joao,On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira@pivotal.io> wrote:Hi Hackers,Attached you can find the diff file that corrects RM 3415If I understand correctly, you're disabling the privileges for GPDB.Is that correct?It should be only for Greenplum.Yeah - I got that. There was a performance optimization in Postgres 9.2 that make the current query in Postgres performant. Ok.Changes looks good to me.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Robert Eckhardt <reckhardt@pivotal.io> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018, 12:27 AM Ashesh Vashi <ashesh.vashi@enterprisedb.com> wrote:Hi Joao,On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira@pivotal.io> wrote:Hi Hackers,Attached you can find the diff file that corrects RM 3415If I understand correctly, you're disabling the privileges for GPDB.Is that correct?It should be only for Greenplum.
Hi Joao,On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Joao De Almeida Pereira <jdealmeidapereira@pivotal.io> wrote:Hi Hackers,Attached you can find the diff file that corrects RM 3415If I understand correctly, you're disabling the privileges for GPDB.Is that correct?
Hi Hackers,Attached you can find the diff file that corrects RM 3415
Attached you can find the diff file that corrects RM 3415
There was a performance optimization in Postgres 9.2 that make the current query in Postgres performant.
-- Thanks, Ashesh Rob -- Thanks, AsheshThanksJoao
Rob -- Thanks, AsheshThanksJoao
-- Thanks, AsheshThanksJoao
ThanksJoao
pgadmin-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
