On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Szymon Guz
<mabewlun@gmail.com> wrote:
Exactly. That's why the very FIRST thing you read should be relevant instead of a bunch of quoted text that the poster was too lazy to edit.
My real gripe is with laziness, not bottom posting. Anyone who can't spend a minute to edit quoted material to the relevant part is forcing thousands of readers to wade through irrelevant crap. It's inconsiderate.
Claims that "top post " or "bottom post" is better miss the point. The real issue has nothing to do with top- or bottom-posting. It's about relevance, effective editing, and paraphrasing.
Notice that I manage to make my point here, and to quote only the relevant bits of your email, within the first twenty lines. That means you can read it without scrolling, and decide whether to click "delete", or continue on to read this paragraph, which may be more wordy and reiterate points made in the first part. You didn't have to wade through stuff that you'd already read before deciding that this long and wordy paragraph, which is mostly fluff and irrelevant reiteration of points already made, was of any interest to you. You already got the important bits. ;-). Now you can click "delete."
Craig
