Re: partition tree inspection functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: partition tree inspection functions
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRBqohaeSWnWNiy0OAkS1SNyBXJTqv746t1cCdMhnos=oQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partition tree inspection functions  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers


pá 5. 10. 2018 v 7:57 odesílatel Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> napsal:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 05:18:07PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> So it seems that I am clearly outvoted here ;)
>
> Okay, let's do as you folks propose.

And attached is a newer version with this isleaf stuff and the previous
feedback from Amit integrated, as long as I recall about it.  The
version is indented, and tutti-quanti.  Does that look fine to everybody
here?

looks well

Pavel


The CF bot should normally pick up this patch, the previous garbage seen
in one of the tests seems to come from the previous implementation which
used strings...
--
Michael

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: partition tree inspection functions
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade failed with ERROR: null relpartbound for relation18159 error.