On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:10 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:On 2/24/17 16:32, Pavel Stehule wrote: > set EXTENDED_DESCRIBE_SORT size_desc > \dt+ > \l+ > \di+ > > Possible variants: schema_table, table_schema, size_desc, size_ascI can see this being useful, but I think it needs to be organized a little better. Sort key and sort direction should be separate settings. I agree. I'm not sure why we need to have separate settings to sort by schema name and table name.I think sorting by schema name, object name makes sense for people, who have objects of same name in different schemas.
On 2/24/17 16:32, Pavel Stehule wrote: > set EXTENDED_DESCRIBE_SORT size_desc > \dt+ > \l+ > \di+ > > Possible variants: schema_table, table_schema, size_desc, size_ascI can see this being useful, but I think it needs to be organized a little better. Sort key and sort direction should be separate settings.
I'm not sure why we need to have separate settings to sort by schema name and table name.
------Alexander KorotkovPostgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.comThe Russian Postgres Company
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных