Re: security_definer_search_path GUC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRAzw0VVfX5da3EGjD2BSaC3Sibm0BTZ_qd0ZEL0--XwXg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: security_definer_search_path GUC  ("Joel Jacobson" <joel@compiler.org>)
Responses Re: security_definer_search_path GUC  ("Joel Jacobson" <joel@compiler.org>)
List pgsql-hackers


út 1. 6. 2021 v 12:53 odesílatel Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org> napsal:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, at 10:44, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Operators use schemas too.  I cannot imagine any work with operators with the necessity of explicit schemas.

I thought operators are mostly installed in the public schema, in which case that wouldn't be a problem, or am I missing something here?

It is inconsistency - if I use schema for almost all, then can be strange to store operators just to public.


/Joel

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Next
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: security_definer_search_path GUC