Re: security_definer_search_path GUC - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joel Jacobson
Subject Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
Date
Msg-id 94bcbbf7-bb25-4838-a875-d09d4e2f6bdd@www.fastmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: security_definer_search_path GUC  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: security_definer_search_path GUC
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021, at 10:44, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Operators use schemas too.  I cannot imagine any work with operators with the necessity of explicit schemas.

I thought operators are mostly installed in the public schema, in which case that wouldn't be a problem, or am I missing something here?

/Joel

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUG]Update Toast data failure in logical replication
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: security_definer_search_path GUC