Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Subject Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
Date
Msg-id CAFcNs+paF3O4tJ470kXf-Csog2Fr-eW3nz_yWxFcO9hDbMbZ0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses
List pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:49 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:03 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> You plan to commit it?
>
> Yes unless many people object the commit.
>
> Michael, you're now modifying the patch?
OK, I have been able to put my head into that earlier than I thought
as it would be better to get that done before the beta, finishing with
the attached. When hacking that, I noticed that some tests were
missing for some of the operators. I am including them in this patch
as well, with more tests for unique index creation, ordering, and
hash/btree index creation. The test suite looks cleaner with all that.


Last night I sent a patch [1] to add more tests and change the operator name. Maybe we can merge the test cases... ;-)

Regards,


--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sameer Thakur
Date:
Subject: Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Supporting tcl 8.6