On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> So maybe we should get rid of the toast table for pg_seclabel. One less > >> catalog table for a feature that hardly anyone is using seems like a fine > >> idea to me ... > > > Is this still an open item? > > I haven't done anything about it ... >
If the final decision is get rid the toast table for pg_seclabel and as I've time then I did it.
