Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel
Date
Msg-id 28520.1413060039@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: No toast table for pg_shseclabel but for pg_seclabel
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> On Fri, Jul  4, 2014 at 10:53:15AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So maybe we should get rid of the toast table for pg_seclabel.  One less
>> catalog table for a feature that hardly anyone is using seems like a fine
>> idea to me ...

> Is this still an open item?

I haven't done anything about it ...
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance regression: 9.2+ vs. ScalarArrayOpExpr vs. ORDER BY
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Shapes on the regression test for polygon