On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 09:17, Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
>> If I find the time maybe Ill submit something along these lines for
>> the next commit fest.
>>
>
> So i just picked up the non-inherited constraints patch and quickly
> ran into the same problem and found this thread.
>
> I think it makes sense to hold off on this patch until these issues
> are resolved. Because we really do need to test the cases when adding
> or removing child tables that have constraints with the same name as
> non-inherited parent tables. And I'm not sure what will happen in
> these cases once these issues are resolved.
Doesn't someone just need to commit Roberts patch? I suppose it could
do with a better review than my eyeballing... Maybe thats where the
hang up is?
