On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So i just picked up the non-inherited constraints patch and quickly
>> ran into the same problem and found this thread.
>>
>> I think it makes sense to hold off on this patch until these issues
>> are resolved. Because we really do need to test the cases when adding
>> or removing child tables that have constraints with the same name as
>> non-inherited parent tables. And I'm not sure what will happen in
>> these cases once these issues are resolved.
>
> Doesn't someone just need to commit Roberts patch?
Yeah, I've just been mostly AFK for ~53 hours. It's committed now.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
